Repository navigation
[Auto-Triage] Auto-Triage Issues Report #67070
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Auto-Triage Issues. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #67135. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🏷️ Auto-Triage Issues Report Summary
Report date: 2026-10-09 UTC
Processed 10 previously unlabeled issues and submitted 13 labels. All 10 label operations were accepted for downstream application (100% acceptance); classification confidence is high. No processed issues need human classification review.
Both prefetched lists were empty. The fallback search supplied candidates. Integrity filtering withheld some search results; their content was not accessed. The exact remaining unlabeled count and repository-wide unlabeled percentage cannot be established from the available data. No partially labeled issues were present in the prefetched input.
Classification Summary
Label Distribution
No community labels were warranted: nine authors were bots and the feature author was a collaborator.
Next Actions
The 10-operation limit is reached. Continue remaining eligible issues in the next pass. Consider labeling generated reports and progress trackers at creation to reduce recurring triage work. The below-5% repository target remains unverified because the available search results were filtered.
References: §37868010591
All reactions