Repository navigation
Conversation
FFDH(E) grouped a required E, so only FFDHE names matched. Align with ECDH[E] and RFC 7919: E is ephemeral and optional. Signed-off-by: Mehrn0ush <mehrnoush.vaseghi@gmail.com>
jvdsn
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2026
jvdsn
left a comment
jvdsn
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like this was a typo. I always assumed it was optional.
jkowalleck
added
the
cap: cryptography-registry
Member
|
cc: @bhess |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
FFDH(E)[-{namedGroup}]toFFDH[E][-{namedGroup}]so ephemeral E is optional, matchingECDH[E].FFDH,FFDHE, andFFDHE-{namedGroup}are all valid constructed names.Thanks @bhess
Closes #1147
Test plan
cryptography-defs.jsonstill parsesFFDHandFFDHE-ffdhe2048match the new pattern;FFDH(E)is gone