Skip to content

feat: add viewer_location to GetOrCreateFeedRequest - #372

Merged
JimmyPettersson85 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/feeds-2044-viewer-location
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

JimmyPettersson85 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/feeds-2044-viewer-location

Conversation

@JimmyPettersson85

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Regenerated from the GetStream/chat branch feature/feeds-2044-viewer-location (FEEDS-2044); chat PR: https://github.com/GetStream/chat/pull/18490. Only that branch's spec change is included; unrelated drift from a full regeneration was left out.

  • GetOrCreateFeedRequest: viewer_location (optional Location, lat in [-90, 90], lng in [-180, 180]). A per-request viewer location read only by the proximity activity selector. Unlike a request near filter, it doesn't replace the other selectors' filters or empty the following selector.

The field is additive and optional. Release this before the chat PR merges, then bump @stream-io/node-sdk in chat's tests/qa/package.json.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@JimmyPettersson85
JimmyPettersson85 merged commit 5983bdc into main Oct 16, 2026
10 checks passed
@JimmyPettersson85
JimmyPettersson85 deleted the feature/feeds-2044-viewer-location branch October 16, 2026 14:28
JimmyPettersson85 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2026
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.8.13](v0.8.12...v0.8.13)
(2026-10-16)


### Features

* add viewer_location to GetOrCreateFeedRequest
([#372](#372))
([5983bdc](5983bdc))


### Bug Fixes

* SDK issues from running chat docs snippets; chat docs snippet runner
([#373](#373))
([bd78f75](bd78f75))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants