[riturajarvind149]

Summary

• Correct the triple-license rule to identify Mozilla Public License 2.0 instead of 1.1, while preserving the GPL-2.0 and Apache-2.0 alternatives.
• Add regression test data for the RabbitMQ Java Client license detection.
• Update CHANGELOG.rst and AUTHORS.rst.

Tests

• License rule validation tests passed (2 tests).
• RabbitMQ Java Client regression test passed (1 test).
• git diff --check passed.

Checklist

• Reviewed the contribution guidelines.
• PR title clearly describes the change.
• Targeted regression tests pass.
• Changes are on a dedicated feature branch with no merge conflicts.
• Updated CHANGELOG.rst.

Fixes #5229.

[knowprasad]

Pulled this down and checked the rule indexing locally with \pytest tests/licensedcode/test_models.py. The rule rename to \mpl-2.0_or_gpl-2.0_or_apache-2.0_1.RULE\ matches the RabbitMQ 5.x+ licensing cleanly, and the datadriven YAML test passes on my end.

[riturajarvind149]

Thanks for checking this, I compared the CI logs with the earlier builds and found the same validation failure around the existing FSL rule there too. Since those files are not part of this PR, I have kept the changes focused on the RabbitMQ license fix