Make stale worker.pid reclaim atomic so two workers cannot own a channel #166

Code-review finding, not reproduced at runtime. An independent static review of #159 found this. The algorithm predates #159: #159 moved it unchanged from apps/host/src/worker.ts into catalog.lock.

catalog.lock at a476c32 (

writeFileSync(pid, String(process.pid), { flag: "wx" });   // claim
...
if (isAlive(Number(readFileSync(pid, "utf8")))) return false;
rmSync(pid, { force: true });                                // reclaim a dead owner's file
return lock(id);

Interleaving, with a stale worker.pid holding dead PID D and contenders A and B (for example two clients starting the same dormant channel after a crash):

1. A and B both get EEXIST, both read D, and both see it dead.
2. A runs rmSync, retries, and its wx write succeeds: A holds the lock.
3. B runs rmSync, removing A's fresh lock file, then its own wx write succeeds: B holds the lock too.

Two workers then own one channel's SQLite storage and socket, which breaks the single-owner invariant in docs/architecture.md. The same window applies to remove()'s use of the lock during delete.

Acceptance: a single exclusive owner of a channel's storage, held across crash recovery and concurrent starts and deletes. Verify it with real contenders started at the same moment after a worker died and left a stale worker.pid: exactly one worker may open the channel each time.

Found while reviewing #159 (#153). Dogfooding #5.