Skip to content

Add email verification inputs - #295

Draft
oschwald wants to merge 3 commits into
greg/billing-phone-verification-inputsfrom
greg/email-verification-inputs
Draft

oschwald wants to merge 3 commits into
greg/billing-phone-verification-inputsfrom
greg/email-verification-inputs

Conversation

@oschwald

@oschwald oschwald commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Builds on #294 (billing phone verification inputs); merge that first.

Adds was_verification_successful and verification_time to withEmail(), as array keys or as the wasVerificationSuccessful and verificationTime named arguments. They describe the most recent verification of the email address. When input validation is enabled, the flag must be a boolean and the time an RFC 3339 date-time. The new parameters come after the existing ones, so positional callers do not break.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

oschwald and others added 3 commits October 9, 2026 20:47
Move the event time check from withEvent into a private helper so other
inputs can use the same check. Behavior does not change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add phone_verification_method, phone_was_verification_successful, and
phone_verification_time to withBilling(), as array keys or named
arguments. These describe the most recent verification of the billing
phone number. With input validation enabled, the method must be
delivered_code, network, or other, the success flag must be a boolean,
and the time must be an RFC 3339 date-time. Shipping does not get these
inputs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add was_verification_successful and verification_time to withEmail(),
as array keys or named arguments. These describe the most recent
verification of the email address. With input validation enabled, the
success flag must be a boolean and the time must be an RFC 3339
date-time.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@oschwald
oschwald force-pushed the greg/billing-phone-verification-inputs branch 6 times, most recently from 0cba765 to 46e52e3 Compare October 12, 2026 19:50

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant