Repository navigation
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 39 minutes. View limit details
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Changelog✅ Contribution check passed. Head: Base: Contribution: 1 new valid fragment(s). Policy: ordinary.
|
Two Finder metadata files were still tracked, and DESIGN.md described only one approved Composer plugin and one rendering fixture. Remove the tracked
.DS_Storefiles, ignore them repository-wide, and correct the validation instructions to cover both rendering fixtures and the existingllm/skillssynchronization behavior.The consumer skill is already integrated through #8 and recorded in the v2.2.0 changelog by #9. This follow-up preserves that implementation, including the remote verifier hardening and Skills CLI removal guidance; it does not duplicate the feature or its consumed change fragment. Composer dependencies and the published changelog remain unchanged.
Validation
composer validate --strict --no-pluginsandgit diff --cached --checkpassed.--since=origin/main.git ls-files '*.DS_Store'returns no tracked Finder files;git check-ignoreconfirms both removed paths are ignored. Local Finder files were retained.During the original consumer-skill preparation, official
skills-ref0.1.0 validation, checkout/clean-archive rendering, all nine archived skill files, isolatedllm/skills1.15.0 lifecycle checks, manual/Skills CLI copies and browser theme checks passed. Those are prior candidate results, not new implementation changes in this follow-up. Native activation/fresh-model performance and end-to-end DevTools workflow execution remain unverified. The remote installation guide retains its warning that a CLI removal report alone does not prove the canonical copy disappeared.Issue #2 was separately validated and closed with its evidence comment.
No merge, release or deployment is requested.